You know something needs to change. The question is how much runway you have and how contained the problem is. Crucible76 offers two strategic engagement formats — both intensive, both hands-on, both built around outcomes rather than reports.
Engagement 02 — Strategy Sprint
30 to 60 days. Defined problem. Defined outcome.
You have a specific operational logjam that is costing you time, margin, or momentum. You have probably tried to fix it internally. It keeps not sticking. The Strategy Sprint is a fast, focused engagement: we diagnose the root cause, build the roadmap, and drive execution — in 30 to 60 days.
What It Includes
- Rapid intake and operational assessment
- Root cause identification — not just symptoms
- Prioritized roadmap with specific, sequenced actions
- Weekly operating rhythm to drive execution
- Deliverable-focused — you walk away with something real and transferable
Best For
Leaders with a specific problem that is clearly defined and clearly costing them. If you can articulate what “fixed” looks like, this is the right engagement.
Engagement 03 — Operational Transformation
90 to 180 days. Embedded. Structural change.
Your operation has been outrun by growth. It is not one problem — it is the infrastructure itself. Supply chain breaking down. Process automation never built. Organizational design that made sense at $2M but fails at $8M. Change initiatives that keep stalling.
The Operational Transformation engagement embeds Crucible76 at the leadership level for 90 to 180 days. We are not advising from the outside. We are in the business, driving structural change, building team capability, and delivering measurable outcomes tied to your KPIs.
What It Includes
- Deep operational assessment across the target functions
- Embedded operating cadence with the leadership team
- Process redesign and implementation — not just recommendations
- Team capability building — your people leave this better
- Measurable outcomes tied to defined KPIs
Best For
Leaders whose growth has outrun their operational infrastructure. If the problem is systemic and requires sustained effort to fix properly, this is the right engagement.
Pricing
Both engagements are scoped individually. Pricing is based on the scope of the problem, the level of embedded involvement required, and the duration of the engagement. Pricing is established after the initial fit call.
What Makes This Different
Both formats are built on one principle: you get outcomes, not deliverables that sit in a folder. Every engagement is hands-on. Every recommendation is something I would implement myself. You are not getting a framework. You are getting an operator who has done this at scale and knows how to drive to a result without losing the team in the process.
Who This Is For
- Leaders at $1M to $15M in revenue with an operational problem that is limiting growth
- Companies that have tried to fix something internally and keep hitting the same wall
- Founders who want a time-bounded, results-focused engagement — not an open-ended advisory relationship
- Organizations preparing for a new phase of growth, a key hire, or outside investment
If your problem is big enough to warrant serious outside help — but contained enough that you can define what “fixed” looks like — one of these engagements is the right fit.